剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 博平 8小时前 :

    这首首尾呼应的歌真是让人流泪。Bye bye miss American pie

  • 卫泓辰 4小时前 :

    机器人和狗子怎么可以这么可爱!隔着满眼的泪看觉得更可爱了妈的!😭

  • 家泽 4小时前 :

    哭了,哭的稀里哗啦

  • 乌雅思洁 5小时前 :

    真挺好的,让人看到周星驰最后是如何终于在大陆的创作者这里得到了显影。

  • 宗政洁玉 7小时前 :

    虽是个套路励志故事,画面在国漫中简直又上个新高度,该有的动态小效果都有,小蚊虫,风动的树叶之类的,总算得到一下满足,但还不是很满足,可以做的更丰富更细节。歌曲用的也丰富,很为影片加分。7.4

  • 中攸然 5小时前 :

    满纸荒唐言,一把伤心泪。

  • 斌暄 4小时前 :

    美术和动作很赞,就是人物太奇怪了。还原真实的话,我们岭南人不长这样啊,还有直接画成猴的。不过这个现实主义题材,人文关怀的方向很戳人。后半段更是让故事上一个台阶,最后的飞身挂狮头很燃。故事关注农村留守儿童,农民工和正在消失的岭南文化,也很难得。就是前半段烂梗较多,人物刻板标签化,成长线也弱,剧本台词缺点顺滑。动画做的像实拍,狮头,木棉花,俯拍的场景都很好,总体算是有诚意的佳作了!

  • 墨红旭 9小时前 :

    表面看是整了个机器人,其实是拥有了合法黑奴

  • 彤帆 0小时前 :

    一人一狗一机共同上路,黄沙废土也能散发温情可爱,为Jeff的率真触动。净土与蝴蝶暗指着现今还能挽回的环境恶化。

  • 庾梅雪 2小时前 :

    末日片+公路电影+成长史,Jeff在阳光下爆爆米花兴奋跺脚喊着again again,期待名字,仰望极光,感受太阳与蝴蝶,义无反顾奔向金门大桥……他一直拥有这些原始的情绪,并单纯地作出每一件事。他靠在濒死的Finch肩头上难过,送他到大桥,和他的狗一起,他完成了指令里的外的所有事。he is not a machine

  • 乘阳伯 0小时前 :

    今年看过最好的公路片,突然很怕我们那个时代的演员变老…

  • 却依晨 7小时前 :

    汽车还在用太阳能板,请问机器人的续航是怎么回事?体型这么大,算力这么强,续航还无敌。我250g重量大疆无人机30分钟续航,和5分钟就过热保护的action2相机躲在角落默默流泪。

  • 德依美 6小时前 :

    要什么男朋友,请给我一只Jeff相伴到老。以及,人类怎么还不毁灭,太阳耀斑你搞快点。

  • 敏萱 8小时前 :

    制作水准优良,舞狮的动作场面做得挺好。少年舞狮版的《少林足球》,套的咸鱼翻身爽文模版,有一些情节编排上能看出技巧痕迹。作为点睛收尾的信仰之跃却剪辑得节奏乱了,先是停下来在等在看,接着还插闪回片段,最后切出赛场到老家的电视上,戛然而止得有些突然,整个的燃点没完全达到。

  • 富察合美 7小时前 :

    我不李姐。视觉挺好。剧本太差了。全程抒情抒情抒情。现实感徒有形,没有融进叙事和人物。手打牛肉丸好评,但潮汕有那么多美食,也没表现一下呢?价值观也有问题,霸凌男主的那帮人咋一下就洗白了?

  • 卫炳申 0小时前 :

    我多希望更好地利用了过去的时间

  • 卫勇 2小时前 :

    与其说是芬奇护狗的故事,不如说芬奇想保留人类最后一丝底线,这底线是不要成为因为饥饿就杀人的怪物,失去人性只会掠夺的禽兽,人与人之间的信任,被机器人模仿留下来的关系,这种细腻与感动,正是数据时代、电子化、大疫情背景下残留的“温暖”。

  • 弥问凝 3小时前 :

    这个拍短片也可以的没必要拍两小时吧…………

  • 卫四泓 2小时前 :

    机器人在创作上需要一个陌生化的处理,不能一上来就通人性,否则就是一个毛躁青年的角色而已。从数据思维到人类思维这个跨越处理得极其简单。

  • 召平卉 6小时前 :

    偶尔的被打动又迅速被单薄平淡的故事线拉回沮丧,末日温情路线的电影太多了,本片桥段无一不是套路活。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved