Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
比如特警看到奈娜开枪直接被吓到后退,汗警官完全听从奈娜的指挥就算怕伤到孩子也该有备选方案吧,以及女总理的到来等等有很多不合逻辑的地方,而且剧情太拖拉,一开始有点误杀2的感觉。
蝴蝶效应→乌合之众→锚定
接这个电影,桑德拉布洛克就是奔着表演奖去的。里面那个黑人警察说得挺好,你要活在当下,不能活在20年前。里面有问题的人,都是活在过去的缘故。但是,又哪能这么容易走出来啊。
一、总体还行,女主很美。二、逻辑不通,编剧背锅。三、立意很高,现实很冷。四、发生雪崩的时候,没有一片雪花是无辜的。没有人想要犯罪,如果发生了犯罪行为,我们都应当思考这到底是因为什么。
电影分享会推荐的2022印度新片,可与《摔跤》和《厕所》媲美。只要敢于直面尖锐的、敏感的社会问题,敢于揭露社会的黑暗面,这个民族就会逐渐好起来,这方面,印度和韩国都还是可以的。
墙中鞋,奶油饼,大衣甜甜圈, life goes on 之罪,更生人不易;Sandra Bullock 演技有点厉害,“惩罚者”和“金并”都好友善
话题尖锐,但节奏太慢了,在女性议题之外还想加入新闻伦理、网络暴力之类的话题,但都蜻蜓点水,反倒冲淡了主题,完全没必要加。
【剧情】平平无奇女幼师突然绑架班上16名学生,然后要求高额奖金和总理接见,原因层层递进,最后交代了一个最可怕的真相
接这个电影,桑德拉布洛克就是奔着表演奖去的。里面那个黑人警察说得挺好,你要活在当下,不能活在20年前。里面有问题的人,都是活在过去的缘故。但是,又哪能这么容易走出来啊。
除了突然zoom镜头很80年代港剧,背景音乐太多鼓点与浮夸之外,还是不错的电影!
这是世界,人与人之间,真的很难做到感同身受。我们能做的,就是尽量做好自己,以身作则。
还看得下去,就一直想知道女主所求是什么,知道了也就索然无味了。
演员都挺好的!!!!!可这剧情?我这个法盲只想知道5岁孩童走火过失杀人,到底算谁的责任?怎么判?
剧本特好,演绎特好。她低沉的接受又挣扎,多么需要那一个慰藉的拥抱。
沉得住气,每一个铺陈的点都有回声,没有刻板形象也没有功能性人物,每一个人都是复杂又弧线完整的。casting也做得好啊,妹妹的养母,近年也是老演“妈妈”类角色,但是一个很高级的妈妈,最难忘是《拒绝再战》里的母亲形象了……桑德拉布洛克不用说,开场那张又丧又拗的脸,可以入备明年最佳女主了吧。
我不懂啊 5岁小孩走火杀了人 为什么要顶罪?把一对像母女的姐妹的重逢拍得像恋人 网飞放过电影吧 流水线作业真挺没劲的 除了桑爪的表演没啥看头
开头和结尾都很好,几处反转也让人很喜欢。但是当中过程太拖了。感觉压缩减少20分钟完全可以更紧凑
本身电影是有瑕疵的,但不妨碍正义的力量。在印度,每16分钟就有一个女性被强奸😭!可悲的是,强奸犯没有重罚,印度女人没有任何依靠的保护。一个人沉默,一群人沉默,每一次的装聋作哑,带了更多无止境的伤害。
逻辑上最完美的地方在于:女教师的主要目的,是要杀掉or揭发当年的强奸犯,防止他再次犯罪。
如果没那么多慢镜头回放就能更好了!这手法现在实在太过时了………
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved