Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
看完电影后又去翻看了导演幕后特辑，三者的分工与预想的比较接近：林超贤主攻战争及宏大特效，徐克承担细节处的特技设计，陈凯歌负责文本及历史叙事。而三者的存在感与贡献值成正比：林>徐>陈。预料到了本片在文本层面的薄弱，但还是没想到其文本竟然蹩脚到了如此令人吃惊的地步。当所有叙事元素都极其显著地化身为功能主义部件时，一切主题表达都是轻浮、乏力、无味，因为人们似乎不仅可以预料到某个元素的出现，还可以预料到它出现的意义，甚至可以预料到它为什么会出现这样的意义。回顾历史固然重要，但太多处理又显得极度不真诚。近几年主旋律电影的一个大问题：普通话中心主义。这种语音层面的统摄完全宰制了历史至少在一些最基础事实上的自发性，时间的厚度被抽走了，只剩当下的政权“大他者”无时无刻不在发出证明自己在场的迫切和焦虑的声音。
三个小时 从头到尾都在打 剧情衔接弱 让人视觉疲劳了
荒诞却温暖的故事 愿每一个努力善良的女孩平安
喜欢陈明昊和张本煜的表演，题材过于新颖，但整体还是让人昏昏欲睡。
吴京有两场戏让我很惊讶，完成得很好。第一眼没认出易烊千玺，放得更开了。最喜欢胡军老师的戏，笑点是他泪点也是他，最后边开车边被火烧的戏演得太好了。
真正的吃土豆、成冰雕等志愿军群像写实的感人事实没拍出心路历程，个人打不死的英雄煽情拍了半天；
整个故事叙事线拉的太长，前因后果没必要交代得那么清楚。太讲求画面的美感，画面的饱和度高得吓人，颜色艳得出奇，感觉缺少一点纪实感，缺少了影片的纪实感，也缺少了人物的纪实感，对英雄人物的歌颂还是过多了点。既然是史诗片，那还是得要点纪实感的。电脑特效真的太出戏了，还不如一些游戏的cg，可以学习一下《铁雨》投核弹的cg部分。庄内cqb 那场戏节奏不错，但是仿佛在看复仇者联盟
认真安利《长津湖》，特别被电影所传达的信仰所打动，有场面、有故事、有力量！ 每个演员的表演都很有穿透力，其中印象最深的是胡军饰演的如此硬汉形象的雷公，在奄奄一息的时候说：“你们别把我一个人就在这，我不想死啊，我好疼啊。”眼泪止不住的流，再一往无前的战士，本质也是跟我们一样的普通人，他也会疼也会怕死，但还是义无反顾的保护战友、保护国家
这就是长津湖战役，我们的先辈与当时美军各方面的悬殊差距，看到雷爸喊疼说不要留下他自己最后死去的片段时，更深刻的感受了什么是前仆后继，电影或精彩或激烈或好笑的片段很多，但让我始终紧张和恐慌的，是那未休止的枪炮声和美军飞机的呜呜声，试想下我只是坐在影院里听声音就对炮弹爆炸、美机不时的轰炸而惊慌和害怕，揪着的心从未放下，那当年那些踏上战场，真真切切面对战争的祖祖辈辈们又该有怎样怎样怎样我们想象不到的经历和感受。
有这么一群人，他们不是一寸也没挪动过，却是生生克制住了摇晃，守住了自己内心的“阵地”。
私货真多啊，有迷影的，也有对行业的吐槽，好坏参半吧。总体剧本攒得挺到位的，埋了不少线都一一回收，感觉最后反转还能再多一丢丢渲染。父王真的帅。
可以给到7分。留心了下身边其他观众的反应，不少迷影梗没有唤起有效的回馈，这点值得编剧团队注意~~
挺好看的烂片。剧本杀：密室杀人+反转+金句+升华，连参差不齐的演技都那么剧本杀。
长津湖，吴京yyds！易洋千玺未来之星！
😭😭😭三个小时电影，才看到半小时就开始哭，宋时轮动员大家奔赴朝鲜的那段，bgm太燃了，看着志愿军身后的“一定要解放台湾”，莫名心酸😭😭😭
3'权力是暂时的，欢乐是永恒的
这节奏也太慢了些，砍掉半小时还差不多，最后的反转也并没有什么惊艳的地方，另外剧组这些人都是很鸡肋，虽然演员本身很好，还不如让一个警察或侦探去推理。
有的梗真的好好笑！！【把张本煜放到特定场景里，他就是帅哥。
长津湖一战我军有四万多的伤亡，其中有三万多人是冻伤的，冻死的有四千多人，有几个连队甚至都在阵地上被活活冻死。这个伤亡和我们的后勤准备不足有关。当时参加长津湖战役的志愿军部队是宋时轮将军的第九兵团，之前是一直驻扎在南方准备攻台的部队，又因为提前入朝，没有准备过冬的衣服。当时为了达到出其不意的效果，放弃了后勤补给，千里突袭，才造成了这么大的伤亡。不过我们也完成了战略目标 打退了美军。美军陆战一师是美军的王牌部队，全歼太难了，全歼了一个整编团已经很好了。无论如何，还是向这些保卫国家的革命先烈们致敬。
词汇匮乏 词汇匮乏 本质上是我对战争片无感吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
