阿米尔汗真相访谈 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 海外剧 1993

导演: 萨蒂亚吉特·巴特卡尔

剧情介绍

  [satyamev jayate」意为“真理战胜一切",这句话写在印度国徽上,是印度的座右铭。宝莱坞电影巨星阿米尔汗历时两年,打造出这一关注社会、贴近民众、深层次揭露社会问题的节目。他采访不同阶层印度人的真实故事,大胆曝光印度社会种种弊病,力图以残酷真相打动和唤醒大众,进 而努力改变现状、治愈丑陋伤疤。
  Episode 1: Fighting Rape 对抗强暴
  The first episode of Satyamev Jayate Season 2, telecast on March 2, 2014, dealt with the issue of rape and underlined several systemic factors that act as roadblocks on the path to justice for survivors.
  The Vote for Change campaign for this episode centred around three focal points:
  The setting up of One-Stop Crisis Centres in every district of India as per the guidelines recommended by the Justice Usha Mehra Commission.
  The creation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Courtrooms across the country.
  A gender-sensitive, scientific and humane protocol for the medical examination of survivors of rape, to be uniformly implemented across the country.
  Episode 2: Police 警察
  On March 9, 2014, the second episode was telecast and it dealt with the need for reforms in the police. In 21st century India, the system of policing is still by and large within the framework of the 1861 Police Act introduced during the colonial British Raj. The police continues to be a ruler’s police rather than a people’s police.
  The Vote for Change campaign for this episode urged citizens to support the demand that the 2006 judgment of the Supreme Court in the case filed by former DGP, UP, Shri Prakash Singh be implemented and a people-friendly police force be created.
  Episode 3: Don’t Waste Your Garbage 不要看浪费你的垃圾
  The third episode of Satyamev Jayate, telecast on March 16, 2014, dealt with one of the most shameful problems persisting in our cities and towns, viz: garbage and the scandalous state of solid waste management.
  The Vote for Change campaign for this episode called upon people to support the demand that incinerator technology for burning waste be opposed and that state governments and union territories work towards implementing the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000.
  Episode 4: Kings Every Day 我自君王,每日
  Telecast on March 23, 2014, the fourth episode dealt with the need for strengthening grassroots democracy and in particular, highlighted important measures to help fight corruption and increase public participation in governance.
  The Vote for Change campaign for this episode urged citizens to lend their support to the demand for social audits of the government’s expenditure on social welfare, and the passing of the Public Services Grievances Bill which will help ensure that essential services are delivered in a time-bound manner to citizens.
  Episode 5: Criminalization of Politics 政策犯罪
  Satyamev Jayate’s fifth episode, telecast on March 30 2014, dealt with the rampant criminalization of politics in our country.
  The Vote for Change campaign for this episode called upon people to support the demand that the proposal of the Election Commission to debar candidates with serious criminal charges (with appropriate safeguards) is brought into effect and such candidates are not allowed to contest elections.
  Just came out of my meeting with Honorable Prime Minister of India Shree Narendra Modiji. Was very kind of him to spare his valuable time.
  — Aamir Khan (@aamir_khan) June 23, 2014
  Shared with him the overwhelming support that we got from people across the country through Vote for Change Campaign...
  — Aamir Khan (@aamir_khan) June 23, 2014
  ..on SMJ on the various issues that we tackled in our show. He has assured me that he will look into all the matters pic.twitter.com/AI7e8cX9Bn
  — Aamir Khan (@aamir_khan) June 23, 2014
  http://www.satyamevjayate.in/petitions-reach-topm.aspx

评论:

  • 浮清舒 5小时前 :

    没几十年脑血栓都想不出这剧情走向,我真是有点那个大病。一群无脑白人/舔白人就愣是强行说五遍,要怎么样脑瘫才真的说满五遍然后尖叫着被杀死;一到剧情推进不下去就开始编故事,还是真·在电影里讲故事,还剪纸人,服;最后就圆珠笔反杀幕后大主使?当然也有可能美工刀,不过我想知道是什么样的傻叉能让美工刀愣是划几十下不还手的,但凡没个大病都老拳手了。真就瞎拍也好意思当电影呗,中间还搞成了滑稽喜剧,真有你的

  • 隋湛娟 6小时前 :

    不算惊悚,但艺术性和深度都高于Jordan Peele,女性导演就是yyds。还挺喜欢这种生发于乡野传说并解读出新意味的本子

  • 虞俊贤 7小时前 :

    逃过了笔仙,筷仙,床仙,没逃过slander man,empty man,candy man。。。imdb分那么高,大概是因为zzzq吧

  • 碧尔阳 0小时前 :

    从什么时候看部恐怖片约等于上半堂非裔悲惨历史课?不是说不对,而是地点选的有问题。另外,就算要上课,你能不能做的不要这么直球招人不待见?做导演也是需要脑子的。

  • 鹤文 1小时前 :

    2022 #20。之前错误的以为这是《招魂》宇宙中的其中一个人物,结果看下来发现完全不是… 希望以后的导演想拍恐怖片就好好拍恐怖片,不要当文艺片拍,还“夹带私货”把政治隐喻变成台词全部说出来… 电影最大的问题是,开始手被蜜蜂蛰了后伤口红肿发炎为什么不立刻去医院救治?这让我从一开头就无法相信这个片子的逻辑。上了警车后我就知道后视镜一定会派上用场。太好猜了。总之在恐怖片里算比较差的,完全可以不看的那种。

  • 祁沁工 6小时前 :

    悬念/惊悚/关爱的打造堪称失败...睡得很香

  • 练靖儿 0小时前 :

    一旦理解创作者的诉求,这部片会更易懂和体会。

  • 莲枫 4小时前 :

    女主最后在警车上自己笑着念Candyman那段表演很不错 老版糖果人出现很惊喜 但是结束的太突然

  • 皮易绿 1小时前 :

    鬼怪塑造有成熟的基底,新时代政治话题+杀戮包装让其更有质感了。

  • 秘骊泓 0小时前 :

    08.27.21 The camera language is amazing! Some really talent perspectives shooting from the city and buildings. 'Get-out' style build-up and slow burn. What an awesome thriller work.

  • 骞锦 6小时前 :

    如果当恐怖片来看,太委屈这电影了。光和运镜非常有质感,诚意十足。

  • 琛雨 5小时前 :

    要恐怖不恐怖,要深刻不深刻,一篓子导演的私货,看个寂寞。

  • 星荣 9小时前 :

    看过把自身主题喊的最大声的恐怖电影。片中他人口述的前传海伦的故事明显更胜一筹,此版的黑人画家纯粹吃饱了没事找事,本身也没经历啥黑人压迫,缺乏内涵,所以电影细数了黑人压迫简史,无奈。艺术行业、皮影戏、灵异配乐等试图营造一种高级感,但和粗滥的剧情和屠杀格格不入,倒是和评论家说的gentrification如出一辙。

  • 衅元武 2小时前 :

    又在玩霓虹光影那一套,把讲故事做成一种自我的凝思,突然像一盆水一样端到我面前,我觉得咦好浑浊。基本上只是借了原版的概念过来做新的故事了,尤其是讲故事的方法,背离了传统叙述,不知道乔丹皮尔对于剧本的权力是多大,我看的时候偶尔怀疑他给的是一个半成品的东西,导演试图用精致但空洞的视听去呈现这个浑浊的故事。我觉得故事的内核会匹配多种形式去做,这个形式包括故事的结构和视听的艺术风格,然后这个部分又会再返回来迈向主题内核,这种双向的统一的和谐,是非常有必要的,但这部电影是四分五裂的。

  • 静橘 6小时前 :

    种族话题果然又是这几年zzzq的一大热门话题,里面对“歧视”的表演也很刻板——30多年过去,白人依然在作死的边缘试探,依然是尖锐话语和剥夺权利的发起者(画廊老板和秘书、评论家、高中女学生、jc都是白人)。而黑人依然停留在一个声音得不到重视、并不被公众爱护的阶段,上至高尚阶层,下至贫民窟,还是需要原始图腾般的守护者来守护——一个杀人如麻没有原则底线的恐怖传说形象竟然担任起了这个神圣的职责,反转成一个种族的超级英雄,“we need candyman” …不觉得很奇怪吗?这都跑偏到对立那边去了。另外,jc不由分说先射杀的片段,就是在影射black lives matter 这个事吧…

  • 焦新立 4小时前 :

    题材与模式较为老套,旧瓶装新酒。但其美学艺术体现,运镜,构图,色彩光影处理等等完美弥补了这一缺憾,尤其几处镜像处理可圈可点,个人认为值得四星。

  • 空琼诗 2小时前 :

    应该叫蜜蜂人…开头恐怖气氛营造的不错。但是后半段不知所云。

  • 诗冰之 6小时前 :

    用恐怖片进行政治表达当然可以,但应该认识到的第一件事就是,主题表达的冲击力和全片的恐怖程度,是直接挂钩的。

  • 汝娟妍 3小时前 :

    政治味太浓 画面惊悚程度还不错 在朋友家四个人一起食用效果更佳

  • 殷雅柔 6小时前 :

    是种族问题 但看了电影还是不知道你在讲什么

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved