Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看完后感觉怪诡异的，就喜欢这种东方宗教恐怖。
如果《咒》这部电影让大家觉得晦气 那么说明这部电影拍的还行 打一星觉得晦气的确实不太适合看恐怖片 看看墙内主旋律电影得了 别侮辱电影
以为最后女主回去烧了或者封了那地道。
咒语故事解读那里，观影者一般会盯着屏幕中心看着一个字一个字往外蹦，最后一下白屏，眼前就是那个咒。这个视觉效果设计挺有心的。其他的，都是老套路了。
超好看的！！不會像一般恐怖國片很出戲，這個超身歷其境。而且你不會看到真的軌的形象，但你會看到身邊的人中邪的樣子，這樣非常容易讓人想像這個發生在現實中的模樣。而且他的主題很特別，不像以前是創造一個厲鬼，真的跟咒有關蠻有趣的。
因为本人文盲不认识后四个字怎么念，所以没有被摆（
这么多年终于等到比《中邪》更棒的华语恐怖片了！！！！剧本写作非常完美！！！年度电影！！
最大的问题还是和《灵媒》差不多 就是既然你要用伪纪录片的形式那就做到底 一些根本不可能的角度和影像放进来真的很出戏 以及双线叙事真的剪得很混乱 除此之外我觉得这已经基本做到民俗恐怖片的最佳了 美术水平足够创造恐怖的氛围 最后打破第四面墙强行把观众拉入到故事当中 虽然真的很晦气 但是现在天天在这样互联网下才是真的晦气
因为本人文盲不认识后四个字怎么念，所以没有被摆（
心目中妥妥的华语最佳恐怖片，某些小肚鸡肠的差评真的没劲，影片设定而已，玩不起就别看呗
自以为聪明的设定，但其实很low！我再补充一下，晦气是骂得最轻的。剪辑烂，融梗，时间线乱，演员演技差，晃得头晕的镜头，明知自己身边的人都死了，明知诅咒的存在，还是自私的要孩子待在身边以及非要拍DV，以及不断害死真正想帮她的人，这狗屁不通的逻辑。大家怎么不骂贞子，不骂厉鬼将映，就唯独骂这个？你们还夸，就算没有最后的诅咒观众，也是低分烂片！
我真的太吃民俗恐怖这一套了，从小去很多寺庙，虽然根本不理解那些神佛的意义、由来，但是耳边的念经祈祷声，古旧的跪拜垫子、神像、洞穴里摆放的供奉台，这些事物对于年幼的我都是记忆深刻并且发自内心的害怕和尊敬。并且电影后面用红字一个字一个字讲述佛母由来，闪完之后的一个白屏，前面符号的视觉暂留真的让我觉得这个“诅咒”“缠”上我了，当听到电影让我闭眼，我下意识的闭上眼，闭上眼仍然有符号的视觉残留，导演这个小巧思真的太戳我了，很喜欢！！还有最后一睹佛母的脸，一度以为是要黑屏处理，没想到导演真的让我们看见，看到一个热评说的很好：我们看见了，我们很爽！
挑了个半夜的场去看，还不如在老厕所有感觉，真废……
剧情结构其实很简单,或许不是最吓人的恐怖片,但绝对是最有新意的恐怖片。女主角开头直问观众「你们相信祝福吗?」、「你的意识,决定你的命运」、「其实我们都在不知不觉中,相信我们的意志可以带来好的结果」,女主角一度说服自己「早就不怕了,所以这些东西都不会存在」、「想着最喜欢的事情就能不去想那些恶」、「凤梨、兔兔、汪汪汪」,不知道大家有沒有经验,例如平常关灯都沒事,但不知道哪根筋不对,突然想到关灯后会有鬼,当下就不敢关灯了,或是夜里平常一个人搭乘电梯都沒事,但是突然想到鬼片的片段,当下就突然害怕搭乘电梯,或是平常大半夜一个人走在沒人的路上都沒事,突然一个意念偏掉想到会不会有鬼,最后整段路都一直念咒语加速跑走,这就是信仰的本质,因为相信,所以一切才会有效果，因为相信,所以存在
3.5 节奏比较失控，所以恐怖桥段显得很零散琐碎；镜头视角的问题我倒觉得勉强能接受。反而细节和美术很棒，也是这个片最“真实”以至于显得“晦气”的原因之一。
吓死人家了啦！看完赶紧打开春晚，冲一冲晦气。
三星半。民俗主题其实还挺对我胃口的，但剪辑真的太碎了，稀碎……伪纪录片不太彻底，有一些bug，但比昆池岩之流好很多。jump scare没有想象的多，更多的是膈应巴拉精神污染吧。佛母杀人居然用那么简单粗暴的方式……诡异观感还不如怪奇物语4的维克纳。总之应该不是一个会给我留下太大印象的片子……
笑死，战狼看多了的温室花朵眼里怎么能容得下这种晦气东西呢
没想到影像语言这么好，中间那段长镜头冲击力很强。
笑死了，引用vv的话：“合着搞了半天就是小时候那种转发十人不然家人暴毙的套路。”等了那么久友邻们相约今晚一起看～最后一起打两星
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
