Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
对于狗狗而言信任它、爱护它就是所有的起点；对于易紧张、怕失败的男人而言，一位贤妻就是最大的动力源泉。
还没看原著，但是看原著的简介好像和这个故事完全不是一个，如果按时间线的话，原著故事可能在这个之后，但其实用原著的名字可能更符合这个故事本身吧，凶犬之眼。日纲相较大上魅力还是差点，相对于上一部味道很重，这一部感觉感官刺激更多，但是回味的稍微差了一点，不知道还会不会拍3，或者说是后传性质的东西，3星
日冈最终追逐着，怒吼着，很渴望成为大上那样的孤狼，可惜，他终究成了一只凶犬，再厉害也只是体制的狗，甚至跟死去的幸太比起来，都不那么体面
训练这样一只狗挺不容易的，而且是自学训练这只狗，真的需要不懈努力。还需要信任自己的狗，这一点也是比较困难的，不相信自己的狗其实是不相信自己。根据真实故事改编就更显得不容易了，在现实中真的有这样的事情存在，这也告诉我们不论什么情况下，都应该不懈努力、相互信任。
现在就需要看看这样的片子缓解一下。。。（虽然还是隐隐觉得对狗狗来说，人类不值得吧
最感动的是狗狗主角也是收容所的狗，是真实故事里露比的🐶朋友
黑社会是人情世故 不是打打杀杀 搞反了 就必须扑街 日本佬拍片也确实敬业 血腥场面不忍直视 靠视觉上感官上的冲击作为营销 多了也腻 也会从开始的不适和震撼变成从容的番茄汁互喷观摩而已
再平庸不过的故事了，尤其是找狗和重逢的时候一定要下雨这种桥段，太lame了。但是就是没法拒绝天使狗狗，太乖啦
看到结局有点感动，善良会有回报。剧情整体流畅，就是人狗的感情好像表现不够。
第一次看到铃木亮平的影片。他的表演让人眼前一亮
片名翻得莫名其妙，强行煽情太过明显，看片尾本尊也不是只边牧。不过电影想表达的实质和《多哥》有点相似：有天分的狗性格可能一开始并不乖巧。看来我得好好挖掘下自己刚收养那只边牧的潜能了，最近正被它弄得快失去耐心了。
白石和弥拿全明星阵来了场流于表面的耍凶斗狠。另，日冈这张嘴真是松得成不了大事
“You know I have a thing for superheroes”
3.5 好多年没看过狗狗电影了 呜呜想到了小时候的灵犬莱西 呜呜什么时候才能有自己的狗子
除了狗没啥看的，剧情太弱。而且格兰特都开始演爹了。？！
狗狗呜呜呜呜呜呜狗狗真的值得世上一切最好的东西
对狗狗如此，对孩子也是如此，找到适合他的方式，鼓励加陪伴。
今天又是想狗的一天 always trust your dog ，dont let her down
阳光温暖
日岡最后给上林那几枪还是挺帅的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
