Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
为了自己不能掌控的意外而有如此强的负罪感甚至寻死觅活的人不是不能理解，只是很难共情，太没有必要。
主角是熊二，伴随着熊二的成长，周围人从嫌弃到追捧，也是熊出没周转不变的内容。
厦门金鸡第八场 算好电影 节奏慢 中间瞌睡了一下
很好看。男主一直在自责，可是他又做错了什么呢？很无奈。
7/10。熊出没居然都是类超英电影的故事线了，成年人看着也觉得很流畅，技术细节也很好。虽然只看了三部春节档电影但我觉得这片比另外两部成人片都强，剩下的也懒得看了。
最开始感觉提到了很多社会问题，但是都没有深挖，没有推到高峰的感觉，但最后感觉只是真实，日常生活哪有这么多戏剧化
这些年日本四大原谅的电影特别多，本片也不例外，看似工整的剧作，有代表性的角色，层层堆叠的矛盾以及最后不出意料的释然与和解，固然能够切中很多观众意料之中的点，但从头看到尾这何尝又不是一种大顺拐
好吧，虽然个人并不喜欢《熊出没》，但每年的电影版都有观看，《重返地球》给我的观感算是相对还可以的一部。虽然有超级英雄+环太平洋+…的感觉，但整体感觉是像《原始时代》《变形计》一样比较原创，而非如《夺宝熊兵》《雪岭熊风》《熊心归来》《奇幻空间》《狂野大陆》有借鉴/模仿其他电影的嫌疑。
错的是什么？是那场意外，那伤口上撒盐的记者们。他们只是在各自正确的道路上（正常开车、抓小偷）做了旁人眼里觉得错的事，饱受着各自内心的折磨和旁观者的恶言相向。PS：女儿被卡车二次拖行的时候...脑补画面都觉得真的太惨太惨了……
这个系列可以果拒了。
比想象中好看。本来以为是对人性的剖析、过度报道的批判之类，没想到是一个父亲的告解过程。在司机自杀之后，从她母亲的角度终于意识到问题所在，纠结，不解，再到最后的疲惫、接受现实。
就是一缝合怪。
熊出没系列第一次涉猎科幻题材，还是一个环保主题，嗯，格局大了，不愧是每年稳定收割票房口碑的春节档电影
看的心里很不平，有时候就是天降横祸，一环接一环，但是我觉得店长和女司机太委屈了，但是人命的逝去，有没有错都无所谓了。她爸爸一味的迁怒，发泄悲伤。没有后悔药的。
已经完全不讲物理原理了，所以，靠的是迷信，也就是小朋友对这个品牌的狂热迷信而编故事。
为了自己不能掌控的意外而有如此强的负罪感甚至寻死觅活的人不是不能理解，只是很难共情，太没有必要。
为了自己不能掌控的意外而有如此强的负罪感甚至寻死觅活的人不是不能理解，只是很难共情，太没有必要。
超级英雄类型片的《熊出没》。在借鉴了DC与漫威成熟超英体系内容的基础上，还勤奋的缝合了太空、灾难、机甲和怪兽等众多类型元素。
留白很多，涉及到家庭教育，社会舆论，学校教育，尤其是社会舆论对于普通大众的杀伤力其实很大，普通群众觉得自己是正义的化身，可对于当事人来说可能是一辈子都迈不过去的坎，联想到现实社会，感触满满，愿逝者安息！可以看出电影想表达的东西很多，但是都没有太深刻的挖掘，留了许多空白
最后老板娘抛弃了勇敢牛牛，爱上了熊二。 要是结尾哥斯拉大战金刚既视感那一段能更长一点，一次看过瘾，可以四星。 拉二胡改成吹唢呐也不错，哈哈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
