剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 妍晨 9小时前 :

    旺达说:我只是一个母亲。

  • 丹宇寰 4小时前 :

    MCU首部惊悚片,诡谲神秘的风格非常独特。不过惊悚片就也注定了不会像三虫同框那么全年龄,其中多元宇宙的部分更多的是推动剧情(甚至有些莫名其妙的没必要…),而不是像蜘蛛侠那种各种情怀老粉过节。另外,旺达的悲情拿捏得很不错,大量刀片警告。总的来说,是部及格的漫威电影,并且还在当中加入了相当的个人风格(山姆雷米的慈笑)

  • 仝鸿飞 4小时前 :

    太过惊喜,完全超出预期。比英雄无归好一万倍的剧情,泪点次数仅次于复联4,叙事风格视听效果绝佳,无数让我泪目的场面(大概是好久没看过如此良心的漫威电影了)旺达第一次dream walking孩子叫他妈妈直接一秒入戏,卷福跟奥妹的演技在科幻电影里也得到了证明,I can do this all day 美队粉狂喜!!!

  • 戈梓楠 0小时前 :

    一直挺喜欢碧梨的,现在更成熟了些但是仍然很真诚,尤其很难得的是她的创作里有很多对自身的省察,并不跟风也不刻意讨好。演出时和乐团的配合也让人好感动。

  • 巫映安 7小时前 :

    就说这设定还是挺新颖的,但这片是真真不恐怖啊。

  • 勾阳飙 5小时前 :

    没有第一部那么经典吧

  • 完飞翼 6小时前 :

    比 "I love you 3000." 更浪漫的,是 "I love you in every universe."

  • 信星津 2小时前 :

    "It's time to cut out the cancer."

  • 婷香 4小时前 :

    这个标准双面人的点子也太棒了,看到童年录像的一刻是近来难得的震惊时刻;温导也有刻意在破颅而出这个点上发力;警察局被端之后阿姨打电话报警有被笑到;配乐一如既往沉浸感超强

  • 应碧巧 4小时前 :

    太老套了,都猜到了,所以杀第二个人的时候完全不害怕了

  • 御子悦 5小时前 :

    2.5星,无论是出于实验性的探究,亦或是纯粹的玩嗨了,温子仁这次的新作终究还是沦为平庸之作,故事本身乏善可陈也就算了,节奏方面也不尽如人意,最失策的地方就在于把敌人具象化为能通过枪支和打斗抗衡的杀手,当敌人的威胁来自于强大的武力而非超群的智慧或超自然的力量,那心理上的压力就难免大打折扣,当然如果说温导只是想过一把b级血浆片的瘾,那我无话可说。当然从血浆片的角度讲,警局大屠杀等场面倒是挽回了些亮点,关于加百列的来源虽说老套,但惊吓度可以打个高分,反倒是之前遮遮掩掩的地恐怖显得故弄玄虚。(dc或是漫威,又或者哪个超级英雄联盟快收了女主这个挂壁吧,这不就是一部最好的超级英雄起源电影吗,名号我都想好了,肿瘤侠分裂侠双面侠二元一体侠,随便选一个吧)

  • 冬凌 4小时前 :

    6/10,多元宇宙讲述了什么故事,又是另一个宇宙的旺达想要自己的孩子,然后就不惜牺牲别人的生命企图复活自己的孩子的命,最后看到主宇宙的旺达和孩子其乐融融的氛围放弃了执念,等等,这不是电视剧旺达幻视的重复2.0吗?所以为啥叫奇异博士2?盘点下我不喜欢其他缺点:

  • 丘和泽 0小时前 :

    音乐我感觉挺好听的,但是这部电影可以边看边做别的事

  • 巧春晖 3小时前 :

    说实话到了现在这个阶段,漫威每部主线都不好拍,承载着过高的期待和过载的信息量,还能想方设法埋彩蛋细节兼顾粉丝和非粉体验,这和隔壁拍出一部好片可是完全两码事。本以为看到这片能顺利完成叙事任务就算谢天谢地,没想到居然还能看到漫威一贯对类型片拓展的坚持。在之前政治惊悚片动作片奇幻片甚至情景喜剧的基础上,本片直接大胆尝试黑暗惊悚类型,各类cult符号随处可见,结尾大战更是少见地反传统超英片。虽然执行略显粗糙,我也没什么可抱怨的了。Rachel真的是时间旅行者的妻子哈哈哈

  • 凌梦 3小时前 :

    故事开始的其实挺恶俗的 一步步揭露出邪恶的本质。后半段特效看的真过瘾和有趣。如果结局加百利杀人后越窗逃跑 消失在城市的夜色中 岂不更加不寒而栗!

  • 同飞兰 8小时前 :

    碧梨我还能爱你很久~

  • 律鸿煊 0小时前 :

    电影没什么逻辑,叙事逻辑可以跟《蜘蛛侠:英雄无归》比烂,一开始教美国小姐学会使用她的超能力不就好了吗?特效有些地方太粗糙了,好在法系打斗够炫酷。福卷两鬓白发造型,终于觉得他好有魅力。旺达的确是美强惨,电视剧明明好好地收尾了,这部一上来就黑化了?

  • 仝睿达 6小时前 :

    节奏感很棒,一气呵成,温子仁拍惊悚爽片越来越得心应手了。

  • 冉惜文 1小时前 :

    Therefore I Am弦乐版全场最佳!!!

  • 尔逸美 9小时前 :

    前半部分套路无聊,后半部分高能,结局又破功,从cult一下子降级为合家欢恐怖片。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved