Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
试图融入历史叙事但比起那些关于大事件背后的“隐藏人物”片子中则比较奇怪，甚至对于架空历史充满着yy。况且这一部里都没有科幻元素，所以也不像漫威电影中九头蛇那样可以接受和有说服力。虽然较为回归英式风格，但是神散形散除了那些个前作中的场景卖卖情怀，真的不必加入“1好2平3迷惑外传”系列电影的行列啊。
黑翻了，连芬兰车站下车的伟人都一起黑了，不过，最惨的是Woodrow Wilson，尽然因为看Stripper跳舞就不敢参战，还能再黑一点么？！
怎么说呢，王男的魅力恰恰是有点虚浮的形式感。当你想在里面增加一些实质的东西让形式感落地变得更有意义的时候。它反而就毁了。
被逆反心理作祟的傻儿子倔了大半部分，好在最后50分钟酣畅淋漓，山羊那么可爱，我就知道虐待动物是要付出代价的。列宁和希特勒果然是一伙的，下一部看他们怎么使坏（又上映不了了）
马修沃恩说不拍X战警续作是防止烂尾，结果没过王牌特工这道坎
Eye to eye踮脚屈膝也太可爱了吧!~…
最后半小时才是王牌特工的范儿，前段注水太严重了，解构历史可以，但也得注意节奏啊，马修沃恩不该是这个水平的，快进着看吧。
顺着两次世界大战的野史写故事，中间一小段还课后练习一样临摹着翻拍了<1917>。前作之中尽情玩儿、建构的部分全都摒弃了。
在枪林杀戮之后顿时化作弹坑里的无尽悔泪。
被逆反心理作祟的傻儿子倔了大半部分，好在最后50分钟酣畅淋漓，山羊那么可爱，我就知道虐待动物是要付出代价的。列宁和希特勒果然是一伙的，下一部看他们怎么使坏（又上映不了了）
装腔作势，儿戏胡闹，去俄国那段剧情尴尬弱智到不行，乌鸡鲅鱼
儿子被打死那个确实是英式幽默无疑了。后来的鬼扯剧情有点拉胯，也就值个三星，笑笑得了。可是网络上为啥这么多打一星上升到政治高度，然后旗帜鲜明反对“历史虚无主义”的？建议你们多看看近代史，多读一点英国文学作品。
還真得蠻無趣的，和之前兩部差了幾條街。就知道有勇無謀的兒子會死，結果還死在自己人手上。美帝總統為了掩蓋自己醜聞而拒絕出兵，還真是很諷刺。某些打戲還可以，例如和俄國妖僧的dance fight。
没有爆头烟花好看啊，只有妖僧跳舞打斗还算精彩，还以为帅哥儿子是将来脸叔的角色，悬念留的莫名其妙，就感觉反派派出一个又一个的牛逼手下但被更牛逼的主角一一干掉，最后把大boss干掉，这么俗烂的剧情居然还发生在王牌特工里
太见鬼了吧，最有意思的居然只有Rasputin跳芭蕾杀人，其余角色死的要么莫名其妙要么让人无语，马修·沃恩又创新低，而且真是每部只有一个女性正面角色，多一个又怎么了，多出现几场戏又怎么了？真是浪费我Gemma姐姐的演技和美丽了，几个演过反派的演员这次再来演反派真是一点惊喜也无，英国人啥时候casting和好莱坞一样了，看样子还要拍个二战，快点拍完去搞别的吧，别一个屎坑里踩水了。
三星半。或許不以原本系列的牌頭去執行會更好，說到底這是一套歷史解讀劇情片，多於前傳動作大片。佛地魔的演技固然有保證，而「萬王之王」同樣不是省油之燈。
没有爆头烟花好看啊，只有妖僧跳舞打斗还算精彩，还以为帅哥儿子是将来脸叔的角色，悬念留的莫名其妙，就感觉反派派出一个又一个的牛逼手下但被更牛逼的主角一一干掉，最后把大boss干掉，这么俗烂的剧情居然还发生在王牌特工里
别人都是坏B,就你家人好，我咋那么不信呢。
...是有卖腐吗 完全没chemistry
关于影片最后关于列宁同志的彩蛋，有些人但凡读过些教材以外的学术著作，先别管靠不靠谱，也不至于如此大惊小怪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
