Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
电影里的东乌克兰人痛苦了两个多小时，而现实中他们在地下室里等了普京&俄军八年多。。。
对当时乌纳的暴行描述其实已经非常克制了😑。“炮击”自己国土百姓这种事对当地人的刺激比什么俄语限制大多了。
虽然电影不是纪录片，但也试图间接感受一下那边的氛围。军队、民兵、雇佣兵、特种兵交错在一起，还要消化一下才行。。。
内容不一定全假，也不一定全真。
他们毫无必要的死去了。
真的很好看这部剧！绝了耶！太绝了！大家快去看！真的很绝！剧情真的很有意思了！
看完这部电影才能更好的了解当下的俄乌战争。
90分钟全景式展现60年代美利坚风土人情，也可以叫“别了，大美利坚黄金时代”。
“本是同根生相煎何太急”
Richard真是描写少年心思的高手，他不仅仅讲述事件，而且让我们成为主角的邻居一样听他近距离的讲故事，成功地把我们带进那个年代，梦幻联动《灵魂乐之夏》，上月球重要还是救底层重要，这是个问题。父亲的侃侃而谈和少年的秘而不宣形成有趣的对比，结尾的 '记忆会让我们以为自己也参与了历史'也为这个亦真亦幻的太空梦做了暧昧的注脚。
啰啰嗦嗦得真的很对味，果然是爱在导演，对于一篇60年到美国的抒情散文
普通人如泥土般逝去。当然一旦影视化，必然会加入主观因素。但依旧不能掩盖其中的反战思想。普通人是不能独善其身的。只能做工具。
联想现实确实是更加难过。
无辜平民被肆意屠杀，凸显战争残酷，
这个就是俄罗斯角度或者亲俄角度的乌克兰问题吧...所谓的纳粹应该指的是这个角度下的针对俄语人群的驱逐和灭绝之类的,以及对小孩的战争和亲欧洲灌输...当然,从亲欧角度来说,就是对主权分离势力的合理打击...翻了下Wikipedia的词条大致是亲欧的立场,里面也提到了对平民的攻击,只不过说法变成了亲俄势力的恐吓行为,以谋求民众疏远抵抗..."这大概就是兴百姓苦,亡百姓苦"...
很久没这么投入的看完一部片子了，真是爱死哪个年代的音乐
喜欢这种结构的故事，谁又能证明他没有登月呢，童年充满美好与幻想，平安长大太不容易啦。
这个画风好喜欢好复古，把小镇生活和太空探索结合得很好。生活的细节和登月这样宏大的叙事放在一起，又有着轻松愉快的基调，观影过程很舒适啊
希望世界和平，不要有战争，在战争面前人类会显得渺小，命运会变得悲惨....
嬉皮士、少年琐事、梦想、自由、激进、迷茫、电视、电影、战争、登月、怀旧金曲……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
