American psychologist John Holden arrives in London to participate in a symposium aiming to expose witchcraft and devil-worship as a fraud, with attention centered on a cult run by a Julian Karswell. Debarking his plane, Holden learns that the symposium leader, Henry Harrington, has suddenly died and he is now in charge. What only the audience knows is that Harrington was clearly killed by a demon, apparently summoned by Karswell to avenge his persecution. Despite both threatening and cajoling behavior by Karswell, Holden determines to proceed, though the only cult member willing to talk about his experiences is in a prison psychiatric ward, catatonic after allegedly killing yet another cult member. However, Harrington's niece, Joanna, believes, based on her uncle's notes, that Karswell may indeed have some satanic powers derived from an ancient tome in an obscure language which he has been able to translate, and attempts to warn the skeptic Holden. Karswell's mother also attempts to warn Holden off. However, the thing which begins to most get to Holden are the occasional, but mounting, sensory and mental disturbances he begins experiencing after an encounter with Karswell, and the discovery that, during this encounter, Karswell secretly slipped a slip of parchment with a curse in runic symbols on it into Holden's belongings, a parchment identical to one Harrington recorded having had passed to him in a similar manner shortly before his death... [N.B. Holden at no point stays at the Karswell estate].
欣赏电影对权贵的嘲弄。引用毛老师的一句话，“左翼电影把清白的良心还给了底层，然后一百年之后，我们的影视剧把心机和穷人，又把天真和富人进行了链接。”
我小时候不吃饺子，唯一让我吃的办法就是把饺子用两张皮捏成太阳的样子并且看这个动画片的录像带。
这样伪科学、反廉政、毁三观的动画真的适合孩子看吗？
虽然最后风间拿到了炒面面包，但精华的炒面夹心还是被小新吃掉了。啊这个隐喻绝了。不要追求成为精英，人生无意义的那部分或许才最重要。
县知府：不倒翁，官运亨通两边倒，剥削百姓有一套。
【4K纪念版】人物设定鲜明，分镜干脆利落，画面非常富有诗意，如果说小时候看是看热闹场面，现在再看，能品出更多幕后人员的用心和创意，还有审美高度。一转眼离剧本定稿到现在整整四十年了，无限感慨。。
现在的动画人哪敢讲这种故事，这么多代指上面光砍就算轻的了
还记得小时候第一次看是在一个夜晚……不知道为什么电视台要在大晚上的放动画片。然后觉得那个老狐狸精的那张脸很鬼魅……
确实挺特色的，封建脸谱那一套，不过故事还是不行…
青春是什么？我们拍了那么多校园青春片，最后还不如人家五岁孩子给出的答案明白。
六星
对于政治权力的隐喻太明显了，就如同大人和小孩之间的权力不平衡一样
一个小瑕疵，字幕好像把恕罪打成赎罪了。
今天在资料馆群里，一个群友晒了阿巴斯的毛毯，我说了一句毛毯很好看，人也很美，就很平常的一句话，被人说我猥琐，我可能真的是社交无能了吧，讨厌现在的自己。从今天起，让看电影这件事变得纯粹一些，不跟任何人私聊了，不聊任何群，拒绝一切社交。以后微信不会回复任何人了，也别给我发消息了。
就是一些中国民俗故事用的猫和老鼠的动作，讲了一个我也不明白故事。童年没看过的还是别看了，不带滤镜真的看不出哪儿好。。。
刚看的。天书中性论，既能用作好事也能用作坏事，袁公秉承现代普罗米修斯观，认为还是要传给人类，但这也可能是玛丽·雪莱的弗兰肯斯坦式结局，蛋生过于天真的禀赋使他无法独自克服三位狐狸精的诡计和暴力，而袁公在被抓上天庭后，将不再存在机械降神，也就是说，蛋生将面临存在主义之后的荒诞处境，等待戈多不再归来，而他心头词典里的天书将如何传给后人却不遭恶用，这将是永远无法解决的难题。当然，如果我小时候看的话就不会说这堆东西了~
狐狸精起舞那段实在太诡异了 http://www.iqiyi.com/v_19rrhnujco.html?vfm=2008_aldbd
“奇、趣、美”，“探民族风格之路，敲喜剧样式之门”；
和普罗米修斯的真正相像之处是内在的悲剧精神:悲剧艺术家不是悲观主义者,相反他肯定一切可疑可怕的东西,富有启迪意义的一切不幸都是正当的,英雄的悲剧让人感到生命的丰盈,悲剧英雄不怨恨,只馈赠。片中所有主要角色身上的力都相当复杂多元,甚至蛋生也不是严格的伟光正型男主,而是轻盈快乐和善于变通的。
这推理不比柯南剧场版强？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
