A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
这终于是一部，烂的跟主演一点关系都没有的电影了
眼下看这个真的是……在天灾人祸不断，各种问题防不胜防的今天，看这部电影只会让人觉得更难过～
5星给原作（生活没不好过的人看了感受不到啥，就打个2星。呸，就算过着好日子的人不少又和我们这种社会地位低的人有何关系？富人、社会地位高的人们总是有无限的选择权，不曾体会将来也不会体会到的痛苦对他们而言是没有意义的正如此片，只不过看看演员（小说改编（作者在小说繁体中文版后记中的话:
关于普通公民如何被“正常”饿死的故事。这个当口看感触会格外深刻。关键它不光写了表象，还探索了造成这种情况的东方社会和人性的内层。触碰到了最关键的地方。
无语，这垃圾玩意儿拍了两小时。期间有段很像本杰明巴顿奇事，旁白一直在嘀嘀咕咕，如果最后不是幻想，那真的大无语。全程不需要演技板着脸就行，整一个致青春的青春片。
15-098日本《致那些得不到保护的人》
确实是“讲”了一个挺长的故事，“讲”的挺长。感觉讲了四五个小时才讲完。
大地震下遭受重创的群体、弱者低保的申请、未尽善力的公职人员和三个互不相识却又家庭般温馨的痛者。
悬疑部分被削弱到几乎没有。前半部分重点呈现的群戏也很没有必要，反而后半部分跳跃性叙事主线才是应该尽早呈现出来的东西。整体氛围实在是太苦大仇深了，沉闷压抑，拿腔捏调。是枝裕和常有社会性事件题材的故事，我们看他的电影却不会觉得目的性如此强烈，非常刻意地营造真事改编的氛围，让故事的艺术性和可看性双双削弱。
女主说世界还没到无可救药的地步，官员说生活的国家就是这样，老奶奶说不想给政府添麻烦。
整体制作挺好，但是内容太薄弱。一个娇小的女人是怎么把两个高大男人拖到高层废弃屋的？从技术上就说不通。
关于离别、生死和爱，1h09m画幅的渐变是分界线，也预示着郭小鲁和苏凌芳关系的转变，窄画幅是《阿甘正传》中Forrest和Jenny，宽画幅是《本杰明·巴顿奇事》中的Benjamin和Daisy。
电影还是绕开了一些社会上尖锐的东西。最后选择了温和的结局。让人不服气。一条生命，甚至更多生命就可以这样结束。
徐静蕾：我对别人都是逢场作戏，唯独对你一如往昔。王朔：让我交出自由青春和我的笔，我也不会交出你。
三颗星鼓励“科幻片”。不过！搞不懂为什么一定要安排青梅竹马—青年分开—中年重新在一起的爱情，还拍的这么像几个花絮接在了一起。如果非要把感情和科幻集合，完全可以学学《降临》。
前半段挺好的，后面情节就比较奇幻了！
最后那场戏很多余，看得出编剧太想把所有主要人物都交织在一起，形成某种大灾难下的共同命运，反而显得“小”了。把东日本大地震与灾后民生恢复社会福利这些问题通过一个连环谋杀案来呈现，是常见的那种社会派推理，但推理部分很弱，导演显然志不在此。算是某种灾后情感重建片吧，我不知道本片能不能对当下受疫情防控政策影响被困家中食不果腹的人有一点抚慰。
再前还看了一部美式愚蠢xx
平庸乏味的前半场+彻底崩坏没眼看的后半程。所谓三王的“王炸组合”结果就这？！长镜头连定格落点都不稳，还能说什么……纵使科幻魔幻都力争创造令人信服的体系，编排逻辑自洽的行动，何况走的是现实主义年代怀旧路数，那么请问，奔赴捷克后的种种是怎么成立的？实验室能这么用？那个年代的异国生活是这么过的？出走非洲又是什么鬼？爆炸意外让男主拥有特异的慢放视觉，也烙印了一跑就摔的创伤，但导演似乎常常忘记后者，只在特定时刻拿来烘托下情绪。干细胞等超现实要素尚能容忍，可只顾完成情感线而缝合的离奇情节完全脱离现实经验，硬跨哲学高度也不怕扯着蛋。尾声的吴彦姝也因为逻辑梗阻的设计白白浪费了演员的口碑加成：容颜未变的一生挚爱出现在面前，怎么又不认识了？不是说好“爱足以抵抗时间”吗？真不懂直呼感动的观众如何代入的
眼下看这个真的是……在天灾人祸不断，各种问题防不胜防的今天，看这部电影只会让人觉得更难过～
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
