The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
节奏缓慢，剧情平庸，岛的演技偶尔还能灵光1下，b太和嫂子演技吊打
之前完全没看过这种类型的，总体来说还可以吧，比起后期生病更喜欢前期恋爱的部分，镜头拍的还蛮美的。加一星给岛进步很大的演技，哭戏期待值比较高觉得可以更好。
生命不管长短，终点没什么区别。每一分每一秒，都不是理所当然的。把握拥有的时间，去爱，去创造，去体验。因为困难，失望，拒绝本来拥有的一切，是很愚蠢的。相反，更应该把拥有的事做得更好。不浪费赐予的每一天。爱所爱的人，专注热爱的事。
眼泪哔哔流
我不觉得这样的题材有什么狗血的，很感动的啊明明。
整部节奏就是一整个有大问题…除了中岛老师抱着帽子大哭这个虐点，其他都显得很儿戏
最后男主没认出女主那里是全片唯一跳出常规的地方了吧，感觉还可以，所以加一星。
虽然是kenty粉丝，但是不得不说演技有、拉垮。剧情就是很俗套又很催泪，因为kenty的演技让我眼泪憋回去了。
很无聊的剧情，岛的演技一如既往……没想到女主演技更差……樱花是挺美的
前面节奏有点太跳了，让后面的感情线有点，不太舒服。
槽点过多 最大槽点是这剧情不知道俗成什么样的人能写出来 近年网飞出品也没有质量保证了
前面进度有点慢...后面发现感情还是真挚的
果然跟樱花扯上的都没好结局，樱花恋人转瞬即逝，前奏看得很舒服，看到早衰症，立马跳到结局，泪止于始，如果全程看完，我怕泪流不止
就是，那个樱花树假的不能再假了。。。
总体来说三星半，剧情基本与原作相同，戏剧冲突也围绕早衰症而展开，删去了原作小说里很多内心戏，毕竟两位主演一直以来的表现都算不得演技派，是很好的取舍。导演手法还挺平的，虽然不算中庸，但意外是没什么性别的镜头语言，很有意思。比起最后晴人没有认出美咲的那场戏，我更喜欢两个人隔着门，美咲听晴人说起生活和回忆的那场戏，镜头语言很简练概括。时间的推移，两人的默契和终将分离，都被浓缩进来了。从中岛个人的演技进步上来说，想给四星，但电影质量不光取决于这一点，只能说原著小说党中岛健人确实很喜欢这部作品吧，才愿意交出这么多真实的自我去感受和演绎。谢谢你，让我喜欢上你。
「変わらないもの」虽然一直在快进 但还是不免俗套地哭了几张餐巾纸。中島先生頑張ってください🫡
节奏快，不拖沓
浪漫点：好美的爱情、好美的亲情
能想象得到剧情，但是还是意料之外的从中间哭到结尾。很多地方都有哭点，虐得好久才回过神来。中岛老师几个情绪爆发点都代入得很深，沉浸进去了
看完了，日本为什么总喜欢青春伤痛文学，春天看剧想看点快乐的啊…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
