During the US Civil War, Union POWs escape in a balloon and end up stranded on a South Pacific island, inhabited by giant plants and animals. They must use their ingenuity to survive the dangers, and to devise a way to return home. Sequel to '20,000 Leagues Under the Sea' . Written by Stewart M. Clamen <[email protected]>
In 1865, during the siege of Richmond, Virginia, the union soldiers POW Captain Harding, Neb and Herbert escape in a balloon during a storm with two confederate prisoners, Sergeant Pencroft and the journalist Spilett. The uncontrollable wind takes the balloon to a mysterious island in the South Pacific in the area of New Zealand. Captain Harding self-proclaims the leader of the group and they look for food; sooner they discover that they are stranded in an island. Further, they are attacked by a giant crab that becomes their first meal. Along the days, they build a shelter and finds that the island is inhabited by giant animals. A couple of days later, they find two castaways on the beach, the aristocratic Lady Mary Fairchild and her sexy niece Elena. Later they find a trunk with weapons and instruments like sextant and shelter with a journal of a man left alone in the island by pirates. When the pirate vessel arrives in the island, they are helped by Captain Nemo of the Nautilus, a submarine that had supposedly sunk in the coast of Mexico eight years ago. Nemo is famous as the man that tried to end strike among man. When the volcano begins activity, they need to leave the island to save their lives. Written by Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
印度电影的走向是“史诗化”了吗？或者是法庭类型片？
剧情剧情 这就是我想要的剧情，看的我热血沸腾。
早已确定，在韩国电影把你甩的车尾灯都看不见的今天，那个人口过剩有种种种问题在我们这里充斥着干净又卫生网络梗用来瞧不起的第三世界国家的印度电影也吊打你，题材以媒体导向和网络风向影响真相的今日社会现状为引一个奸杀案背后的反转更是对体制的无情揭露切准时代病症，对程序正义的嘲讽。虽然反转刚开始略显突兀但是能感觉到用尽心思去圆试图保留悬念，第三幕问题也很多讲述感过于严重缺乏流畅性也陷入被动，就这政客和警察的sloppy做事够蠢的，但是对人权和女性关注正是对自己国家的质疑的敢“一个国家尊严取决于对女性的尊重”太强了这句台词，guess who是律师口中的捂嘴，只有幸福的幻象。不说了省的像我杰伊比姆短评被捂
前一个半小时不懂为啥8.6，后一个半小时这8.6打的值👏🏻
不必崇拜阿三的电影，若是没有层层的迷雾笼罩，这片天空抬头望也有繁星，只是雾霭茵茵，何以见星！
4.群众是善良的，但群众又是无知的，他们往往很简单，缺乏逻辑性，容易被情绪煽动。
老实讲，电影想反映的社会问题有点太多，东一榔头西一棒槌的。前面以为探讨的是女权，平等，校园(职场)霸凌，后面又开始说政治手段，警官勾结。总之就感觉有点too much
评分虚高，真的。感觉是“一群长年待在摄影棚里丧失想象力的人做出来的东西”，电影可以生活化，但是得有美感，不是流水账
一堂社会学教研课，期待第二部
4、没思想的民众都是犯罪者的打手
最出彩是睡了索菲亚罗兰的林教头
要先把问题摆上台面，然后才有通过现代文明途径解决的可能性。
现在印度的电影大多都是讲反种姓、人权反面的，并且拍得越来越有意思，这部的剧情反转，更是拍出了新高度。“即溶正义”，法律和正义不总是一样，鞭笞继续吧。
从这个电影也可以看出来，各国都是天下乌鸦，一般黑 ，哪里都差不多
终于不用再看#爱而不得#私定终身#抓小三#守活寡#生是你的人死是你的鬼#这种老掉牙的破烂爱情片了，爱情的理想形态难道不是这种开放式的多人家庭吗？聚是一团火，散是满天星，肉体开不开放咱另说，先把精神打开，酒杯碰起来，心里话唠起来！
量太大太撑了，印度电影就这点让我有点水土不服
那些拿拍摄手法、剧情bug说事，讽刺别人因为题材打五星的人，自己不也因为题材给战狼，长津湖打了五星吗？每个人都有自己的评分标准，没有谁比谁高级，用不着装高级讽刺别人。
从电影角度来讲，是一部合格的商业片，稍微有些拖拉，高分就还是在于“敢拍”，以女性被强奸案调查为入口，就在大家接受了一个设定的时候，剧情全面翻盘，而当惊诧于律师的身份时，又出现了第三层反转。一部片子拍了女性地位、权力制度、种姓制度、社会舆论，看着倒也是会让人思考
年底一部片救活一整年
来之前看过一些影评都夸，声称女性主义电影，进去直呼上当，头一次见围绕男主角为第一视角的女性主义。非得睡同一个男人才能将几个女人联系起来吗？想不通。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
