Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
原著看了开头一部分就看不下去了，影片的解谜寻宝的过程还是可以的，但各部分衔接较差，整体象电视剧水平，太平淡。
改编自马伯庸的同名小说。
没看过原著小说，但是感觉电影拍的还不错。既有古董行的传奇故事，又有局中局的悬疑，整体来讲很吸引人。美中不足就是某些情节在配乐细节上的不够，导致对情绪和情境的渲染不够。看到开元通宝的时候，想起我在报国寺卖铜钱的那些时光，还有在报国寺和潘家园看到的那些假古董，挺有意思的一段经历。
尚可（模仿百里二郎语气🤣）。有被爽到但不过瘾，瑕疵很明显。逗趣解谜，层层递进。但故事需要更多的细节来充盈，角色还可以做到更丰富，几对人物间的关系拉满，但整体都被简化了，就总觉得差点意思。富贵的死有点套路了，不过三人的表演还是给我往戏里拉了一点。想用特效视觉来呈现古董鉴定的过程，但实际效果做的并不好。或许是想象力不够，只是用动画的形式辅助声音解说，完全展现不出古董鉴定的专业技术性。最后，只有李现说话感觉和其他人不一样，和表演不契合，好像配音！
许愿要不是自学成才，还真解不了他爷爷和他爹布的局中局。
拍得乱七八糟、莫名其妙，硬生生弄成一个解密闯关速通视频，就连台词设计、耍宝环节和镜头语言都有一股网剧味。我想看的正儿八经的商业电影，而不是这种劣质产物。
解谜加狂秀文物知识，结果秀的太多太杂没了味道
李现的演技 从头到尾就别变过脸 也真的是无敌了，两个比鉴别古董 看的头皮发麻…好尬 整个故事桥段就没有一点惊喜…
就是做局+解密+做局+解密的反复循环，没啥大毛病但也没啥大荧幕感，还是网大质感。
电影质感很差，剧情则是一连串密室逃脱，远古以前第一次看《盗墓笔记》电影版时的恐惧感又出现了
超出预期的体验，真正意义上建了一个惊喜局、悬疑局、冒险局，很久没看到化学反映如此好的双雄片。雷佳音和李现的CP感真的非常好！很搭！最最最惊喜的感觉是阿如那和咏梅，一出场就觉得惊喜！关键打破近年来观众对“盗墓”题材的设想，各种人物以新的设定带来新鲜感真的很棒，本月C位片，值得二刷！
所以许爷爷还是把真佛头给了木户了？
解密过程还是十分生硬，年代感打造的不错，“这个礼物好，能生养“这个笑点好，”郑国渠和他奶演得好，和《国家宝藏》相比还是差得远。
老戏骨的演技还是不错的，只是这个剧本身 真的太扯了 🤪
前半段剧情还挺流畅的，鉴古炫技和笑点安排的还算合理；中间在许愿他爸住处发现那块“阴在阳之内 不在阳之对”的墙砖之后，佛头藏身之处就明朗了；后半段从进古墓开始剧情有些莫名其妙地为了冲突而冲突，大结局一出来整一小时的谜题设置似乎只是为了折腾药家、大朝奉和五脉某些人，佛头还是早早的送给了日本人…一众演员都是熟脸，以至于片头打完三位主演名字之后连着两页四个特出，现如今电影界卡司阵容也卷的这么厉害了吗？
适合做网剧，解谜是挺有意思，其他就一言难尽
郭子健老师能不能放下导筒，立地成佛？黑漆麻乌，后期配音，廉价的网大质感，丹布朗+天下霸唱大乱炖。有时候不得不承认观众缘这回事，不然你无法解释马伯庸或者紫金陈这类作者的成功。
创意还不错，就是呈现得有点low，找的演员也不太对头。
居然还致敬了《活着》；看到最后不禁要问一句，折腾这么一通，图个啥呢？答案大概是：逗观众玩儿…
节奏还行，但是为了肢体节奏扯画轴，是文物专家会做的事么。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
