Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
知道是番外，知道换团队了，但是故事还是讲崩了，很难想象看完月红的故事竟然没有一点感动
剧情填补原著部分，人物的脸时不时扭曲一下，反派台词尬到我了。
有时间再看一遍
有些失望，虽然弥补了剧情，但是这个叙事和节奏比剧集还差很多
一个小时有点浪费，《月红2》是久违的更新，但就为不占TV制作人员的时间，交给SUCCESS制作，剧情与动漫有部分出入，解tv的惑只有好小一部分，众人崩的可以，只有729配音算是保持住了……动漫和这个电影还是要分开看的，《月红2》推荐看cut
很好看，一个参观的内场和外场的交错，一场厨师团队的纷繁复杂的劳作场面，让我们能很好的了解西餐厨师的分工和平时的工作场面。颇为精心的主人公的设置，在最终一刻的爆发。各人的情感和需求的交错，不经意间的全盘拖出。
按照正序把故事理了一遍，补充了很多内容。感动又悲伤想哭🥲七夕快乐。
一镜到底 人人都有困难 当出于好心去关注他人的困难时 又会被他人带来的新的问题所击垮和破坏 到后面人人崩溃 情绪一直拉扯得很好 很紧张 更像是一集电视剧 结尾也soso 想逃逃不出去 服务业好辛苦 看得跃跃欲试 又在没有进入前就想逃离 sad 惊悚的标签到底？最近看mayor of kingston也是惊悚标签 都是在关注精神方面的压力 嗯
细节好评，毛绒绒的苦情树花朵，细腻的涂山场景，都相当不错看，不知道官方能不能给个高清的树当壁纸玩玩
3）一个小时的影片里很多画面都是原来的剧集出现过而且是一模一样的。可以理解是为了让观众回忆起之前的剧情并且串联上。但至少有15分钟也太长了吧！
5）这样的七夕表现对于老粉丝真是大失所望。
每个单元故事都很感人，更新就是太慢了，不过我喜欢里面每个人的故事，非常棒！！！
狐妖不愧是音乐番，一个特别篇能整两首歌，还都好听！尤其是那种女生唱的叫轮转的，活活把我听哭了！
一镜到底，大家都演技都很好，真的很紧张，那个过敏一出，我就知道要出事了，最后主厨倒在了热闹的餐厅角落，还是很有感觉的。
带了狐妖色彩看的 但是感觉这期没有预想中的好看
感觉加了层灰蒙蒙的滤镜，一个小时的时长，内容量就20分钟的样子。其实我是在月红篇里找涂山雅雅和东方月初的互动，惩恶扬善双使这一对欢喜冤家才有趣。
作画风格与之前相差太大，剧情弥补了正剧中的不足，七夕献上也是特别棒了，刚好最近又补了一遍剧情，最后祝大家都终遇一人，终得一心！
算是完善了一下中间的空缺情节吧，没有什么惊喜。
东方全程露腹肌，露的也没有美感，只感觉美人风评被害。不想吐槽了，槽点太多。就挺失望的。
人物画风很奇怪。这个就像作者说的剧中剧吧，一整套续缘有自己的一个圈子，可以看成平行世界发生的事情（？），除了画风不对劲以外，我觉得剧情还是很能接受的。不止画风还有画质，不敢相信一部剧居然拍成这个样子。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
