Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
Ryan Reynolds 演自己的类型片。之前的free guy 觉得编剧和导演多少是用心了。这个片基本就是看过就忘（恨不得一边看一边忘）的爆米花片。而且，好几个MCU人物，经常会觉得“喂，我到底在看什么？”的感觉。
总体而言应该说是一部好看又比较平淡的片子。有一些打斗场面，有家庭温馨的伦理场景，有一些科幻元素，有一些搞笑段子，基本上就是这部片子的全部了
That’s definitely a lightsaber.And Shawn Levy is dope.雷诺兹终于结束了连续几年一直给我一种死侍的感觉，事实证明他还是有演技的。巧合的是本片也像《蜘蛛侠：英雄无归》一样引入了Second chance ，但是这个理念却从头贯穿到尾，简直是教科书式的设计，“你不需要拯救我的未来，你（们）就是我的未来”几段亲情戏看得我哭的稀里哗啦的。
上一部rafflo叔和garner一起主演的电影 好像还是女孩梦三十呢！
如果再回到从前，所有一切重演，我是不是就能弥补所有的遗憾？煽情为主，科幻和打斗都只是点缀。贱贱的对白一如既往地搞笑，父子情深也非常温馨感人。it’s easier to be angry than sad
看到 70% 左右就放棄去睡覺了，大概只有大亞當去酒吧跟他媽對話那邊較感動
这个导演的作品（博物馆系列，失控玩家，铁甲钢拳）都很喜爱，但是这一部属实是一般，又一部RR式电影
唔……我刚才看的时候突然想到，我是不是在看一部好莱坞商业大片辉煌时代最后的尾巴上的科幻电影啊……如果真是这样，那就真的是，看一部少一部了。不敢想象未来的电影市场会是什么样子……会不会就没有英雄了，没有自由，没有对利维坦的控诉和反抗，剩下了集体至上，剩下了乖乖宝，剩下万寿无疆了……虽不知道那种正确或者更好，但是呢，这样的转变我真的不想再来一遍了……fuck！
还是挺有意思的啦~~所以亚当为啥长大了之后头发颜色也变了呢哈哈？剧情逻辑上真的是不敢想，想想就感觉应该是有大问题。。他们这样随随便便地穿越来穿越去简直是。。。。小正太真的挺可爱的，演得也棒棒的！赞一个啦
世界不需要更多死侍话唠电影了，请精简台词，谢谢。
森林景色很赞，科幻打斗很精彩，但依旧是一部弱智的话痨电影。
本意是科幻包裹下的内核亲情片, 却被拍成了比三流电视剧还要无聊, 冗长且毫无逻辑和危机感的拉家常.
6.6分。至少我觉得这部电影比《失控玩家》要好，尽管整部电影的科幻部分十分儿戏，其余部分俗不可耐（我真的没办法不去想在亚当失踪的这段时间亚当的妈妈去哪儿了），但是母题可能刚好能和现在的我引起共鸣吧。肖恩·利维的活泼真的有点…幼稚，跟埃德加·赖特的内涵甚至是詹姆斯·古恩的恶趣味都相差甚远。相比于新项目《死侍3》，他真的更适合去接手大卫·叶茨去整哈利波特的IP。
看到 70% 左右就放棄去睡覺了，大概只有大亞當去酒吧跟他媽對話那邊較感動
儿子两三岁时候喜欢看萌鸡小队，陪他去影院支持下电影，小时候喜欢的长大了也不会忘记。
告诉孩子：如果走丢了，在原地等，不要自作主张去找妈妈。妈妈孩子找来找去找了一个半小时。。。
我从不懂科学，也从不理解它，超越了生死的不幸和黑洞，穿越的无奈与甜蜜，名为亚当，无法创世。
披着科幻动作外衣的家庭片，但很温暖，小朋友的演技可圈可点。
出乎意料地好，编剧水平超过95%以上投喂给成年人的国产电影。
美佳妈妈和麦奇、大宇、朵朵、欢欢四只小萌鸡与其他动物们一起快乐地生活在森林里。一天，人类的挖掘机队伍进入森林，树木被砍伐，萌鸡们的家也被破坏了。美佳妈妈被迫带着萌鸡们上路，打算去“山的那边”寻找新家。 但要到达“山的那边”并不容易，他们必须要穿过人类生活的城市。萌鸡们对城市中的一切都充满了好奇，但却不知道危险也正在向他们逼近
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
