Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
看不懂的、名导导的、名演员演的，一律算好片。
一场美丽的绮梦，维果莫滕斯每一道皱纹都在吸人。关于人类的未来，惊悚又现实，是进化/医学问题更是哲学伦理问题。
#22#41画面的猎奇和美感更是放大了故事的贫瘠和乏味…要靠要求演员用表达障碍的形式来描绘这未来人的性空虚和性高潮，看的观众那叫一个难受连连。全片撇开Sark装置，给我留下最深印象的居然是美女托头钻电钻…太优雅了
剧情设定挺高级，幻想未来没有生理痛苦的人类。
【4.5+】柯南伯格最佳。从一个世界链接向另一个世界，外向的陌异和内化的身体装置得到了惊人的平衡和丰富，不再（如20世纪时）只拘泥于概念化的建构，其在片中被观看后共享，乃至传递向影片的观看者。而每个全新却无意义的组织器官，如块块碎片建筑最后那雄壮而诗意的尾音，我们终于体悟到这是一场混沌的盛宴。
柯南伯格难得出山，而且视听和故事把控力还在。道具实感重，破败的后现代风格场地本身就蕴含着许多含义。故事虽后现代，但社会隐喻、探讨议题以及黑色幽默都很明确。
全程只有murmur，听不懂也没字幕，不知道是不是只有我们这一场是这样的。
在一位艺术家眼中
只想说 非常柯南伯格 顺便讽刺了一下当代艺术
科幻版《钛》 （2022.7.4豆瓣6.3）
3.5。Surgery is new sex.
性、暴力、欲望，电影以及艺术无非就那么点事
Howard Shore配乐一如既往的好
thanks, but no thanks
看不懂但大为震撼 柯南伯格脑子里装的到底是啥呢
。。。。。。
柯南伯格难得出山，而且视听和故事把控力还在。道具实感重，破败的后现代风格场地本身就蕴含着许多含义。故事虽后现代，但社会隐喻、探讨议题以及黑色幽默都很明确。
这电影相当相当的行为艺术了。重口味又没啥核心内容，˃ʍ˂挺无趣的，纯粹看演员表演了，而且重口味镜头恶心🤢，不是俺的菜。
没劲。调成 3 倍速、黑白色，当做低成本 cult 片还行。
人体行为艺术的载体 未来自由意志和信道的发展 最终还是政治和权力社会的工具
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
