Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
驴驴的觉醒和自救的故事。另外片中的小孩也太笨了点，大概是吸毒者的后代脑子也有点问题吧。没有太大的感想，中等吧。PS.不过倒是有警示作用，男性对育儿不但没用，还危害很大，连吃饺子蘸的那盘醋都不如。单身生育自由自在。
片子本身并没有什么亮点 但是放在当下这样一个以隔离为题材的喜剧片居然如此写实 家人离世不能离开剧组 突发疾病没有专业医护人员照料 想私自逃离遭到射杀 等等 估计主创并没有想讽刺什么 因为他们压根想不到现实能如此荒诞
Sometimes it can be good, but for this one it just tells the truth that shooting what behind an awful movie is still an awful movie.
还行吧…推荐可能不会推荐哈哈哈哈哈。一个半小时足够了这个片子
一群人嗨大了Tik Tok换脸还蛮好笑的……看开头还以为是热带惊雷的节奏，差远了
疫情期间，无聊的演员们拍了一部无聊的假纪录片，给无聊的观众解乏。
Shut.In.2022.1080p.WEBRip.AAC2.0.x264-NOGRP
各种无厘头，我就喜欢这种让人轻松愉快的电影。
开局还挺有意思的，后面太长了，一直在想怎么还没结束啊
5/10 挺好的但是也挺差的，整个电影好在它不是完全在走套路，虽然它有段子堆起来显得有些不一样，非常精美的镜头和特效和这种美式烂段子竟然异常和谐...但是除了这些其他都零零散散，故事也就起个辅助作用，段子大部分也没有很好笑，就真的很一般，讽刺了个寂寞。
2020s疫情下的Day for Night（（观感更像是一部投放在b站的民间集哏狂欢作，up主那栏是一溜的合作方
很多明星客串，不是很好笑，甚至有些地方有点无聊
一群在好莱坞混迹很久的，依然没有典型作品的，为了赚钱不得不拍的网大电影。几乎看不到可取之处，如果真要说有什么，只能说有一点讽刺当前的好莱坞虚伪吧。
各种无厘头，我就喜欢这种让人轻松愉快的电影。
渣男损友上门来，锁门破障全靠她。
5.5.并不高明的讽刺，跟《不要抬头》一比更是相形见绌，虽然很能get对疫情之下好莱坞各大系列垂死挣扎的影射，然而也就仅此而已。作为阿帕图的喜剧片居然也不太好笑，大概可以和《滑稽人物》并列阿帕图最烂了。佩德罗帕斯卡演的挺有意思。
如果傻乎乎的我需要在一个傻乎乎的下午看一部傻乎乎的电影，那么我成功了
3.5 梗好密集，啥啥都往里塞，但有的笑点确实精准
胡BB了俩小时，结构挺松散的，但情节却意外的好看，轻松幽默，谁还管拍的到底是什么，笑就完了。顺便提一句，片场的酒店太好看了，谁能给科普一下是哪家酒店，等疫情结束了可以亲临现场去体验一下。
2.5 。 发生在片场的一出恶搞闹剧，题材比较新颖，设定挺好的。有些段子确实挺搞笑的，不过整体剧情还是太无聊了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
