Synopsis
Do-seong (Yoo Min) is a child monk who lives at a small mountain temple with the head monk (Byeon Ki-jong), learning the teachings of Buddha. He becomes attached to a young widow (Choi Eun-hee) who comes to pray at the temple, and the childless widow entreats the head monk to let her raise Do-seong as her own son. Conflict ensues when Do-seong's real mother (Kim Seon-young) appears, but she leaves the temple for the sake of her son's future. On the day the widow is to take the child down from the mountain, the head monk discovers that Do-seong has killed a bird by ensnaringit in a trap and decides not to let the boy go into the secular world. When Do-seong finds out that his real mother has been to the temple, he sets out to find her.
Notes
"A film that has garnered recognition for its cinematography and direction by eliminating sentimentality and unaffectedly capturing the quiet life of a mountain temple. A Hometown in Heart demonstrates the camera technique and directorial skill of movies that appeared after the liberation of Korea."
A Hometown in Heart, adapted from playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung), was hailed upon its release as "a masterpiece that marked a new pinnacle in Korean moviemaking after the liberation." Eschewing new-school sentimentality to quietly express a boy's longing for maternal love, the film unfolds the everyday lives of three generationsthe head monk, a young monk, and a little child monkagainst the backdrop of a quiet temple in the mountains. The long shots utilized by director of cinematography Han Hyung-mo to capture the beautiful scenery of the mountain temple from a distance received great critical acclaim at the time. Also, each of the film's characters is convincingly portrayed through the skillful direction of Yoon Yong-kyu. In particular, the scene which expresses Do-seong's desperate yearning for a mother's love and his birth mother's past visit to the temple by combining them into a dream sequence reveals deep consideration for articulating story and emotion via a compressed visual grammar without tending toward sentimentalism. The movie's final scene, in which Do-seong awakens from his dream and sets off down the path in search of his mother, is both touching and beautiful. The film also features Choi Eun-hee, in the part of the young widow who warmly embraces Do-seong with her love, in one of her first roles.
Afterword:
- Lee Kang-su, writing under the pseudonym of Kwak Il-byeong, first adapted playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung) into a screenplay, which was then shot for the silver screen with additional embellishments by the director.
太好哭了，這才是真正時代的眼淚。而且確實基本上必須要在香港待過20年以上才會有感覺。
之前不怎么了解她，看完电影以后觉得她应该有很多不甘和遗憾。搞笑的事:梅和张都去世快20年了，两家的唯粉还在撕，果真是恨比爱长久啊，看了真可笑。
4.0分。这部电影在类型上是一个奇怪的混搭物：它拍的是梅艳芳的故事，也找到了一个还算合适的演员来演她，可演员演着演着，突然就插进来一段梅艳芳本人的影像资料，于是你难以判断它究竟算纪录片，还是剧情片。最吊诡的地方在于，当我看着王丹妮的表演试图相信她就是梅艳芳时，真正的梅艳芳出现了——且往往在动情/煽情时出现，这是在干嘛？这不就是在提醒我正努力共情的梅艳芳是假的吗？电影是假的，但情感必须是真的，亲手摧毁自己的虚构，说明连创作者自己都不相信。关于这部电影在技术上有多糟糕，只需要一个例子就能说明：王丹妮在泰国决心离开杨祐宁的那场戏，她下车，转身离开，面无表情，杨祐宁在身后注视着她的背影…我勒个去，真是巧了，我大学里的某次学生作业就这么拍的，简直一模一样！那个作业我至今不敢回放，因为连我自己都觉得太尬了。
电影本身问题很多，纯质量三星出头，然而加分项不少所以四星
电影从剧本到演员，都不满意
将五集导演剪辑版看完也将梅艳芳一生看完说实话作为传记片这部做很不出色。但着眼梅姐感情事业亲情友情经历来说如此处理也是可取的。毕竟梅姐此生大起大落太多，演员们演绎是对梅姐敬仰与真实录像交相呼应让人动容03年我们失去了两位巨星如今只能在电影中回忆
很不喜欢别人称呼她为‘东方麦当娜’之类的，阿梅就是阿梅，独一无二的！不要拿任何人来类比
套用“艺术人生”三板斧——忆童年、拿照片、把琴弹——生硬串联的流水账。对梅姐不甚了解的我，电影观感远不及前几年看到99年春晚《床前明月光》时来得震撼。
点名批评舞台布置，观众应援太夸张了
提前点映，影片和预期差不多，意料之中，主要是卖情怀。我触动的点可能跟一般人不一样，太挂念香港了。
梅姐，我很想你。
即使知道那个只存在于银幕上的流光溢彩、饱和过曝的往日都市如此虚假可笑，知道这个集体记忆的icon以及她所身处的时代早已问题重重，尽管女主被残忍地缩减为引出梅艳芳“真身”的道具，还是有不少时刻被感动到。一个私人刺点：03年悼念张国荣的场景，街上戴口罩的人群，那无比接近我对19-20的记忆，影院拟制了外来者的静观视点。
Anita和Leslie都问，你会记住我的吧…想起了一句歌词“当某天，雨点轻敲你窗，当风声吹乱你构想，可否抽空想这张旧模样。”很多人可以登上舞台，可是舞台会纪念的是那些善良勇敢正义独一无二的人，他们就是
傳記片來說，主角是扮得不錯，但感覺上就是平舖直敘的故事，可能梅艷芳實在是太經典吧。
香港女儿。突然发现她也已经去世快20年。。。作品人物形象还不错，除了演张国荣的那位实在不敢恭维。本身拍得并不算太好，更多还是流水账吧，不过几个重点时刻还是抓住了。作为小时候憧憬的人物，看得真是好唏嘘。当年那个星光璀璨，要艾敬唱“香港香港怎么这么香”的地方，也早就物是人非，不复光芒了。。。
12/30@国金百丽宫 逝世18周年纪念专场 7.2 成色比预期高。尽管素材海海但并未淹没在一味膜拜里，演得有自己理解，剪得节制精确，拍得也低调恳切，混着旧影简直太杀。未料从姐姐病榻前一直哑哭到尾，湿透冬夜口罩。所谓绝代，便无再有。
杨过长发的造型像慈爱的大妈，袁承志也老了。
我边看边想，可能对于传记电影来说，好的剧本更为重要。不知道是不是属于剧本不够扎实，感觉影片只是将几个人生比较重要的节点以片段式的画面铺开了，阶段与阶段、情节与情节间的跳跃感严重，浮光掠影，不轻不重。作为一个不了解梅艳芳的人，我不明白为何梅如此渴望爱情甚至对姐姐结婚感到介怀，梅与阿ben的感情看不到一丝爱意前后交代更似没头没尾，看完电影只能说对梅的生平有了大致了解。王丹妮确实有几个瞬间非常神似，但大多数时候更像一个长得像梅艳芳的TVC超模。你能从王丹妮的模仿里看到一丝梅艳芳讲话时的语气和神韵，但只要梅艳芳的纪录影像出现，短短几秒你就感受到梅艳芳真实的人格魅力向你扑面而来。画面里梅艳芳乐观爽朗的笑容，几句简白又真诚的话 ，已经让我泛起泪光。永远怀念香港，永远怀念狮子山精神，永远怀念梅艳芳。
来万达看的粤语版，演绎和真人影像穿插真实魅力差别就出来了，选的moments和角度也比较小姿态，按传记片/故事片其实可参考《波西米亚狂想曲》那种思路？目前这样呈现的话不如看纪录片……
前半可以，后半乱了。一开场就是郑少秋唱乡广美的歌，后面也一直出现那首歌，有点出戏。后藤夕辉应该就是近藤真彦，她那时不知不觉间一直做人家小三，后面也一直在美化那段感情，有点过。人物传记片难拍，尤其她经历了好几个敏感时期。古天乐和林家栋演得倒是不错。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
