A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
尼基塔和T1000你俩算是都完了！千篇一律的拽，动作场面有《史密斯夫妇》的影子，但是这剧情也太扯了，整个片子故弄玄虚，半个小时能说明白的事儿扯了这么长时间？还说的莫名其妙！即便是当做电视剧的一集来看也太水了！
武戏还不错 但故事能不能走点心？ 基顿特别像个憨憨
老家伙们都在讲故事，李阿姨说我还能打，还要代表越南人民k你一顿
打斗9分
故事性一般。喜欢电影里加入的越南元素，景色以及人文。结尾有点儿仓储。不明白为什么两人在老房子内，只能留有一人，而枪响之后，Ann离开。两人之间的感情线也不太清晰。不推荐影片。但，Maggie Q 是真美。
把片尾字幕看完了，片尾音乐怎么这么像《敦刻尔克》的片尾呢，旋律都一样……还有为什么迈克尔基顿是头番李美琪是二番，明明这么一部女主戏，不是一次两次看到了。
死着死着又活了。打着打着上床了。all shit
讲了100多分钟的玄学故事，就是不把越战遗产主题给点明。我有时很疑惑，这些不算差的技术团队围着一个装腔作势、不知所云的本子转几个月，是为了洗钱吗？这是温克认真写出来的本子吗？还是将写在便签上的零散创意拼出来的本子？
高开低走？除去结尾的嘴炮升华还是可以的 mq依旧很美
我为自己没有读过戏剧理论而未卜先知的行为感到丢人 我太丢人了 我太无知了 我居然看个名字就知道未来会发生什么 我真是丢人啊
除了童年时的女神以外也就没啥别的了，逻辑太二逼了。
没有多少可圈可点之处，纯粹是为了看Magie Q，有意思的是如此俗套的戏路，竟然还能吸引“鸟人”来参演，难道也是为了美人而来？
奔着Maggie Q和马丁·坎贝尔看的，Maggie Q还是那么好看，马丁却没有给到任何惊喜
男主男配都超过70岁了，天！导演还是007的御用导演，这个阵容好奇怪的样子。故事打斗都还过得去，3星没大问题。
Cliched plot, decent transnational filming, smart editing, nice mirror shots
Well.? 我们Maggie还是很好看的。Keaton老斯虽好但是总觉得和角色不太搭。好喜欢Anna在伦敦的书店。小Anna的演员挺好看的。
莫名其妙上的喜欢这个男人，还跟他一夜情，还不忍心杀掉他，虽然最后杀掉了他，但自己中途也差点死掉呀。
Maggie Q怎么还是这么美啊 不过很难再拍这种电影了吧
谢谢陪伴我慢慢航程，我觉得挺好看的，女主加大大的星
一帮上世纪70年代的人在21世纪初演了一本上世纪90年代风格的动作片
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
