A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
很痛苦……就算是为了吉伦哈尔也没法坚持了。
就是炫而已…在发动机轰鸣声中，跟唱耳机里的“sailing/takes me away/to where i've always heard it could be”才是整部片唯一的情感渲染…
要是不拿无人机搁那炫还好，银行战斗还挺好的，后面一塌糊涂，有些地方还剪辑快速又混乱，直接开晕
所以本片的主角就是LA，哪怕吉伦哈尔演得如此癫狂。卖拷贝本次还是挺克制，爆炸秀集中在后半截，挺会省钱，效果一如既往，无人机各种加速+翻转镜头真是玩嗨，大全景航拍和持晃镜头此起彼伏，好一个高潮迭起，手术戏是最好一段，但又无视常理了。结尾有点别扭，也不深究，爽就得。
爆炸贝回来了，喜欢的自然喜欢，可惜还是感觉没有以前的感觉，也许是我变了吧。
冗长拖沓，高潮太长视觉疲劳，剧本上更是漏洞频出。
仿佛是迈克贝的demo reel，纯追车愣追了俩小时还是有点厉害。而且这么多年了，他还是这么花里胡哨热爱爆炸，干劲很足啊。但把dt那一小片正常开车十分钟就能开完的区域拍得显得这么大，每十分钟就要空中镜头大空翻又让人觉得是在预算不足打肿脸充胖子。
无人机拍摄运用的炉火纯青啊，女主艾莎真不错！其他的，炸就完事了。
点映只允许男观众参加，不允许女观众参加，哪怕报名的男观众人数并没有那么多也不许女观众去，有本事上映后也别卖女观众票！
整体来看故事上和人物特别是配角刻画上虽有些弱，但绝对是优质的商业动作片无疑了～
一个勃起的男人，可惜硬度不够，这是看完后的第一感觉，不愧是迈克尔boom，吉伦哈尔就是背锅侠，斯德哥尔摩综合症，反派都是工具人，大杂烩，槽点满满，爽到过头！
老美在疫情期间拍摄了这样场面的电影，确实是不把新冠当回事了。抢劫、枪战、追车都不提了，片中展现的那台性能彪悍的救护车极其内部的配置实在是令人赞叹，其中的移动远程会诊在危重病患救护和转运中作用巨大。在这部片子里，老美炫了一下自己的医疗硬件，毕竟有这样配置的救护车在国内是凤毛麟角
节奏很紧凑，还是不错的，丹尼明显比威尔演的更好。威尔的变化完全没有章法，一开始射击警察他还那么紧张，最后怎么就可以为了一个陌生人直接杀掉自己的兄弟？这是怎么想的我实在没搞明白！本来镜头就够晕菜，这下子搞得我更特么晕菜！有谁懂的来给我分析分析
4.19号晚19:00于CBD万达，又是和盆友看的
3.5星，135min。廉颇老矣 尚能饭否？结局很温情，中端有点松垮，就豆瓣这个评分，absolutely underestimated.
卖拷贝过时趣味大集锦，K歌sailing除外，老吉你还是长点心吧，我可预言过你拿奥斯卡影帝的啊！
感觉像是吉伦哈尔演夜行者后的衍生，角色属性非常相似，估计演的很轻松。摄影玩的很开心，卖拷贝纯玩票之作。
全片八成的戏都是在公路上开展的警匪追逐，迈克尔·贝导演通过大量的手持摄影、不规则构图、多视点交叉叙事、快剪快切，这种炫技式的视听语言调度，使较为单一的场景及情节营造出了紧张眩晕的氛围。不过毕竟整体内容单调，高频动作戏、过度感官刺激同样也会导致审美疲劳，略嫌冗长。另外，救护车中严重枪伤的警察居然能在如此长时间激烈、急速的飚车中生存下来，实在是过于奇迹化了，显得失真。而且，一路上只顾车内一个警察的救护却不理大量追捕警察的性命，逻辑上也不通。。。
我看的是首映当天13：20那场，全场不6个人。电影结束，我看见微信群里出资源了，然后陆续的看到很多批评的文章。
老吉在这部电影里：Go,go go! Move,move,move! Dame! Fuck,fuck,fuck!Fast! Come on! Shit,shit,shit!
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
