Yael Hersonski's powerful documentary achieves a remarkable feat through its penetrating look at another film-the now-infamous Nazi-produced film about the Warsaw Ghetto. Discovered after the war, the unfinished work, with no soundtrack, quickly became a resource for historians seeking an authentic record, despite its elaborate propagandistic construction. The later discovery of a long-missing reel complicated earlier readings, showing the manipulations of camera crews in these "everyday" scenes. Well-heeled Jews attending elegant dinners and theatricals (while callously stepping over the dead bodies of compatriots) now appeared as unwilling, but complicit, actors, alternately fearful and in denial of their looming fate. ——Written by Sundance Film Festival
三星半。原著有两个人物,两个故事,电影只拍了吕西安这个。
两个人大笑着,Lucien接着说:
He stopped hoping, and started living. Everything has a price, even for the eternal restplace. In Paris, things are on sale, on display. There are trades everywhere, you trade your soul for money, for sex addiction, for social status, even for a little respect. Never learned the rules, you trade everything for nothing. Game over, illusions predues.
男主从无名到兴盛再到没落,拍得还可以,但故事本身并不怎么吸引人~
时光总无情,渺渺红尘万般妄。
虽然很华丽,但拍得毫无新意,一部小说改编的电影还是需要旁白和对白推进故事的话,那我为什么不去看原作呢?
跃阶层“幻灭“的悲剧!假新闻和辟谣及掌声都是生意!
没看过原著,但电影宛如一部带画面的有声小说,只听旁白就能知道故事惹。
两个人大笑着,Lucien接着说:
海明威说巴黎是一席流动盛宴,这个片子实在是把巴黎纸醉金迷、浮动的欲望展现出来了。上一个让我惊艳的复古质感的电影是巴里林登。台词功底还是得益于巴尔扎克了?
历史不过在周而复始
评论里一个个都是好journaliste,我只信🍍
有文化的人吵架形容对方微不足道会说like a breeze… 主要还是巴尔扎克写得好,但是也没有必要加旁白加得那么多,电影完全沦为书的附属,比起同样是名著改编的《纯真年代》差了点克制
百年前的评论、炒作、诋毁等各种手段从内核与当下无异。
興衰史的敘事感很流暢 文字的書寫以及編輯室猴子鴨子的混亂感很中我的命門了 一方面也是我欽羨的世界 瘋狂恣意隨性 掌握筆桿的人有話語權(想當一次惡勢力XD)but希望大家真的 一個半小時能講完的話不要拖拖拉拉講不完帶壞節奏
虽然很华丽,但拍得毫无新意,一部小说改编的电影还是需要旁白和对白推进故事的话,那我为什么不去看原作呢?
巴黎掀开她的裙子,让这个信徒般的年轻诗人,看见她骇人的裸体。今夜向整个巴黎宣战的于连,将在傍晚时分走入家乡的湖中
3.8,还是看着巴尔扎克和维瓦尔第的面子上
巴尔扎克看穿了欲望的本质啊……一切的龌龊和堕落几百年没变过。有了巴尔扎克的文本,电影已经成功一半了
看完电影倒是对鸭鸣报名字的由来有所领悟,一个感受:要在世俗意义上活得有点尊严,有没有才华不要紧,有没有头脑才是关键,19世纪的法国是这样,现在亦如是。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved