剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 娅彦 9小时前 :

    毋庸置疑,大烂片。反思每个大牛片和大烂片之间,究竟差了什么,一个是行云流水的铺陈,架空的台词,没有必要的情节,而另一个每个空镜都有含义。

  • 仇志强 9小时前 :

    二星半,男主演的很有意思,但是女主的设定挺有问题,其实能够理解对女性追求自己事业的表达,但是用现在的经营模式给套到古代,挺没说服力的,电视剧的宁毅不违和,是因为电视剧在第一集里面已经就明确表达给宁毅开现代人视角,也就是开挂了

  • 安辰 4小时前 :

    我可以接受月球是科技造物的设定,甚至喜闻乐见,但全片还是拍得像是闹着玩一样。WOT

  • 寒鑫 0小时前 :

    主角团进入月球后的情节可以一看,仅此而已。

  • 公星腾 4小时前 :

    2022-7-14路上拿白送的流量在爱奇艺上看的,平均1.25倍速阅,其中家庭剧2倍速都嫌慢,要是删掉还能加分。地摊阴谋论读物改编,往后剧情愈发神棍。巨物特效不错,可惜灾难片要素过少,地标都没破坏几个,月球贴脸的同时地面还在轻松愉悦地飙车打劫,洛希极限应该是相互的啊。于文文在片中是干嘛来着?

  • 娄韶敏 3小时前 :

    深海、巨物、幽闭恐惧症者慎重,反之也会非常喜欢这种视觉震撼。

  • 徭夜绿 7小时前 :

    还行,虽然bug多,但很多技术细节展示吊打现在许多所谓科幻片了,节奏也不错

  • 卫曾浩 3小时前 :

    设计很儿戏,但拍得不儿戏——它自然很难看。儿戏有儿戏的玩法。

  • 摩凝莲 5小时前 :

    爆米花特效大片,设定还算有趣。女朋友不让我吃爆米花,哭了。

  • 包奇伟 6小时前 :

    其实是合格的好莱坞灾难片 虽然题材不新(进入月球内部算吗) 特效也还过得去 地球跟太空两条线都能呼应上 人物也都有交代 电影院看应该会能再加半星 现在分有点低

  • 居夏青 8小时前 :

    在空荡荡的厅里和她紧紧靠在一起,拉着手,吐槽了全程。

  • 劳盼秋 3小时前 :

    好大一盘棋,外星人,人工智能,巨型结构体,什么夸张上什么。至于故事里的逻辑通不通也已经不重要了。这人工智能得像高达OO里的外星人学习,长得一模一样,智力差距太大,既不会分裂前后围堵,也不会吸收复制,努力推了个大球,结果最后被一个EMP炸弹解决。

  • 及俊风 4小时前 :

    that's priceless sci-fi for me.

  • 明夏青 5小时前 :

    看了开头,之后随意快进一会儿完。对二房这类喜剧丑角一路“开挂”以及全盘的现代商业模式没什么兴趣

  • 戢又琴 3小时前 :

    【C】很少用过时来形容一部电影,但这部电影真的让我觉得非常过时…最重要的是观众可能是抱着《2012》的期待值去看的,结果看到的是一部超低配版《星战》,如果我是在一个20年前的夜晚在睡前看到电影频道偶然看到这片的话我会觉得很好看,但毕竟现在已经不是20年前了。另外对白和角色写的都是些什么…角色情绪和情感完全是无的状态,编剧真这么好当的吗…

  • 回初柳 3小时前 :

    难看到能一起看完两小时的人都可以称之为难友!就是,一个反向爽片还用40分钟交代剧情铺垫前史,以为自己是「驾驶我的车」啊,你配吗?上天和逃难两条故事线完全劈叉,感觉像看了三四五个网大随机剪一起。这种规模投资的电影应该剧本套路很成熟了,怎么还能把初级错误全犯了一遍……视听特效也并不震撼,听到Ai攻击人类时候简直都要把我土笑了。

  • 振沛 2小时前 :

    还是承袭了电视剧的高质量的,让我眼前一亮。无论是职场线还是情感线都蛮饱满的,推进流畅,看起来还挺过瘾。

  • 平新苗 9小时前 :

    这就是传说中的末世灾难科幻玄幻家庭爱情伦理公路大片吧,也不知道这些个词按什么顺序排,反正片子也是想到哪拍哪。拯救地球就靠两个十年没上过太空+一个从没上过天的假博士+只有两个引擎的博物馆珍藏航天飞船,真棒!按照将军的话就是我觉得他们能行就一定行。后半程强行穿插的公路追逐人性拷问亲情爱情的桥段,我简直无从下嘴。这都是怎么想的啊,大数据分析观众爱看什么就揉吧揉吧放一起?有一说一,特效不错的。

  • 东门忻乐 7小时前 :

    特效就值四星,在带着音频和动感座椅的电影看一定很爽。虽然逻辑上有点bug,但总算中规中矩,该有的都有了,看着很熟悉。但是末日的气氛很足,空中对战很不错

  • 彩娅 7小时前 :

    作为sp是合格的,简简单单也还行,但是不能算作电影,只能算加长版电视剧,而且《赘婿》第二季也会拍,那估计这部的情节第二季也会直接继承下去。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved